Not every instrument is backed by its official text yet. At least one law or rulebook covered here has no official source (tier 1) retrieved for it yet. No finding on this page is shown with confidence above “Probable” until stronger sources are retrieved.

Financial Integrity Monitor

Canada CA

Domains (D1–D6)
1
Sources
11
Role actions
8
Horizon <90d
1
Jurisdiction profile
Largely CompliantTier ARisk: IncreasingMixed

Canada's AML/CTF/CPF regime rests on the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA), enforced by FINTRAC as FIU/supervisor.

MoreJune 2024 PCMLTFA amendments expanded FINTRAC's information-sharing powers. A federal public beneficial-ownership registry (Bill C-42, CBCA amendment) operates alongside fragmented provincial corporate registries. A 2015 Supreme Court ruling exempts legal counsel and Quebec notaries from AML obligations, a persistent structural gap FATF has repeatedly flagged.

Key deficiencies
  • Constitutional exemption of legal counsel, law firms and Quebec notaries from AML/CFT obligations following Federation of Law Societies of Canada v. Canada
  • Historic FINTRAC under-disclosure of actionable intelligence to law enforcement (Cullen Commission finding)
  • Provincial/territorial corporate registry fragmentation undermining the federal beneficial-ownership registry
  • Uneven supervisory intensity across DNFBPs and money services/virtual-asset businesses relative to banking, securities and insurance
Recent developments (18m)
  • June 2026 FATF Plenary adopted the joint FATF-APG 5th-round Mutual Evaluation Report of Canada, for publication September-October 2026
  • FINTRAC assessed a record ~CAD 177 million penalty against Xeltox Enterprises Ltd. (Cryptomus), a Vancouver-based, Russia-linked crypto payment processor (October 2025)
  • FINTRAC revoked registrations of dozens of crypto/money-services businesses in a stepped-up enforcement campaign (late 2025-early 2026)
  • Canada sanctioned Russian drone manufacturers and 100 'shadow fleet' vessels alongside G7 partners (November 2025)

Member jurisdictions

This page covers Canada federal law once. Each member’s page covers its own law, regulators and enforcement (5 of 7 members covered here).

Brief

Lead signal

Lead Signal

Read full brief

Lead Signal

Canada's fifth-round FATF/APG Mutual Evaluation Report, published 29 September 2026 following a November 2025 on-site visit, found the country was not placed under increased monitoring and was recommended for normal, rather than enhanced, follow-up. The report credits Canada with advancing its beneficial ownership transparency framework, pointing specifically to the federal ISC public beneficial-ownership registry, live since January 2024, and to FINTRAC's October 2025 duty requiring reporting entities to cross-check client beneficial-ownership data against that registry. At the same time, the evaluation flags weak effectiveness in risk-based supervision and under-prioritised prosecution of complex money-laundering cases relative to the risk Canada itself has assessed. The combination is architecturally significant rather than incidental: Canada has built structural defences, including a working public BO registry and a cross-check obligation for reporting entities, but the mutual evaluation's own language suggests those defences are not yet translating into supervisory or prosecutorial outcomes commensurate with the underlying risk. A favourable headline outcome on the FATF ledger should not be read as a clean bill on effectiveness.

Other Developments

Recommendation 8 upgrade. Canada improved its rating on FATF Recommendation 8, which concerns the money-laundering and terrorist-financing risk profile of non-profit organisations, from Partially Compliant in the 2021 follow-up assessment to Largely Compliant in the 2026 evaluation. The report nonetheless continues to flag weakness in the oversight of ordinary tax-exempt non-profits that sit outside the Canada Revenue Agency's Charities Directorate registered-charity regime, meaning the upgrade reflects progress within the registered-charity perimeter without yet resolving the broader non-profit-sector gap.

Dominant money-laundering typologies. The mutual evaluation states that money laundering in Canada is mainly linked to proceeds from drug trafficking, fraud, commercial trade fraud, and tax crimes, frequently involving organised crime groups and professional money-laundering intermediaries. The explicit reference to professional intermediaries is an enabler-jurisdiction-adjacent signal: it points to facilitators operating within Canada's financial and professional services sectors as a structural feature of the country's laundering risk, distinct from any single enforcement action.

Stablecoin framework, standing context. Canada's Stablecoin Act, enacted via Bill C-15 as part of the Budget Implementation Act 2025, designates the Bank of Canada as primary supervisory authority for non-prudentially regulated stablecoin issuers. Implementing regulations are targeted for a 2027 in-force date, and the registry, reserve, and redemption obligations the Act contemplates are not yet operative. No new development occurred within this specific window; this remains carried-forward standing context relevant to Canada's broader financial-innovation and AML perimeter.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The beneficial-ownership transparency progress credited in the mutual evaluation intersects directly with corporate-transparency developments tracked elsewhere: a public BO registry with a reporting-entity cross-check duty is precisely the kind of structural mechanism that other monitors assessing corporate opacity and enabler-jurisdiction risk would want visibility into, since it narrows (without eliminating) the space in which professional intermediaries can obscure beneficial ownership. The mutual evaluation's own identification of professional money-laundering intermediaries as a feature of Canada's dominant typologies is relevant to any enabler-jurisdiction or professional-facilitator tracking undertaken by adjacent monitors, since it names the facilitator channel as structurally significant rather than anecdotal. The standing stablecoin framework, while not active this window, remains a forward-looking point of contact for any monitor tracking financial-innovation or payment-system developments in Canada, given the Bank of Canada's designated supervisory role once implementing regulations take effect.

Outlook

The near-term marker to watch is the maturation of Canada's implementing regulations under the Stablecoin Act, targeted for 2027, which will convert the Bank of Canada's current supervisory mandate into operative registry, reserve, and redemption obligations for non-prudentially regulated issuers. On the AML/CTF side, the mutual evaluation's own flagged gaps, specifically weak risk-based supervision effectiveness and under-prioritised prosecution of complex money-laundering cases, are the structural weaknesses most likely to generate a subsequent enforcement or policy response, since FATF's normal-follow-up recommendation does not require Canada to resolve them immediately but does place them on record for future review. The non-profit sector's continuing oversight gap outside the registered-charity perimeter is a second area where either a policy response or a future evaluation cycle is likely to re-test Canada's progress.

weekly_brief_draft · JID CA
Domain intelligence (D1–D6)

D1 Sanctions

Not covered

Sanctions is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D2 Beneficial Ownership

Not covered

Beneficial Ownership is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D3 Enabler Jurisdictions

Not covered

Enabler Jurisdictions is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D4 Conflict Finance

Not covered

Conflict Finance is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D5 Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

Not covered

Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D6 Compliance Technology & Active Defence

Not covered

Compliance Technology & Active Defence is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D7 AML/CTF Regime

AML/CTF Regime

Continue reading

Canada's fifth-round FATF/APG Mutual Evaluation Report, published 29 September 2026 following a November 2025 on-site visit, is the defining AML/CTF Regime development for this cycle. The core outcome is favourable on the headline metric: Canada was not placed under increased monitoring and was recommended for normal follow-up rather than the enhanced follow-up track reserved for jurisdictions with more significant deficiencies. That outcome sits alongside a more qualified effectiveness picture within the same report. The evaluation specifically credits Canada with advancing its beneficial ownership transparency framework, citing the federal ISC public beneficial-ownership registry, operative since January 2024, and FINTRAC's October 2025 obligation requiring reporting entities to cross-check client beneficial-ownership data against that registry. This is a structural improvement to the architecture underpinning Canada's AML regime: a public registry combined with a verification duty closes part of the gap between nominal ownership disclosure and the reporting sector's actual due-diligence practice.

Against that structural progress, the mutual evaluation flags weak effectiveness in risk-based supervision and states that prosecution of complex money-laundering cases is under-prioritised relative to the risk Canada's own national risk assessment identifies. This is the architecture-over-incident distinction that matters most in this cycle's finding: Canada has not failed to build AML infrastructure, but the evaluation's own language suggests that infrastructure is not yet generating supervisory and prosecutorial outcomes proportionate to the risk it is designed to address. A normal-follow-up recommendation does not require immediate remediation, but it places these specific gaps on record for future assessment cycles.

A further specific finding within the regime concerns the non-profit sector. Canada improved its rating on FATF Recommendation 8, covering the money-laundering and terrorist-financing risk profile of non-profit organisations, from Partially Compliant in the 2021 follow-up to Largely Compliant in the 2026 evaluation. That improvement is qualified: the report continues to flag weak oversight of ordinary tax-exempt non-profits sitting outside the Canada Revenue Agency Charities Directorate's registered-charity regime, meaning the upgrade reflects progress within the registered-charity perimeter specifically rather than across the full non-profit sector.

Finally, the evaluation's characterisation of Canada's dominant money-laundering typologies is itself an AML/CTF Regime-relevant finding: proceeds from drug trafficking, fraud, commercial trade fraud, and tax crimes, often involving organised crime groups and professional money-laundering intermediaries. The explicit naming of professional intermediaries as a structural feature of Canada's laundering risk is a signal about the sophistication of the facilitator layer operating within the regime, rather than a one-off incident.

Outlook

The most consequential marker going forward is whether Canada's supervisory authorities respond to the mutual evaluation's effectiveness criticisms with concrete changes to risk-based supervision practice, since the report itself identifies this as the principal remaining weakness despite the favourable headline outcome. Prosecution prioritisation for complex money-laundering cases is the second area to watch, given the evaluation's explicit statement that current prioritisation does not match assessed risk. The non-profit sector's continuing oversight gap outside the registered-charity perimeter is likely to remain an open item until a future evaluation or domestic policy initiative specifically addresses tax-exempt entities outside the CRA Charities Directorate's scope.

D8 Commercial Activity

Not covered

Commercial Activity is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

Regulatory horizon
Adopted2027-Q1 · ±year

Canada Stablecoin Act implementing regulations

Non-prudentially regulated stablecoin issuers will need to register on a Bank of Canada public registry, maintain 1:1 reserves, and offer at-par redemption once implementing regulations are finalised.
1 dated · 3 pending date · baseline fim-2026-07-07
Role action cards
MLRO

Canada's FATF mutual evaluation finds structural AML progress but flags under-prioritised prosecution of complex money-laundering cases relative to risk.

The evaluation's effectiveness criticism on risk-based supervision and complex-case prosecution signals an area where domestic SAR-triggering and escalation practices may come under future regulatory scrutiny, even though Canada avoided increased monitoring this cycle.

3 evidence refs
Compliance

FATF credits Canada's beneficial ownership registry and FINTRAC cross-check duty as structural AML progress.

The public ISC beneficial-ownership registry and the October 2025 FINTRAC cross-check obligation are now explicitly recognised structural controls; compliance functions relying on beneficial-ownership verification should note this as the benchmark FATF is measuring against going forward.

1 evidence refs
Legal

No material change this cycle.

No material change for this persona this cycle

Board

Canada avoided FATF increased monitoring but the evaluation flags unresolved supervisory-effectiveness and prosecution-prioritisation gaps.

The favourable headline outcome reduces near-term reputational and regulatory-status risk for Canada-exposed institutions, but the report's own effectiveness criticisms mean the underlying risk environment has not been fully resolved and may attract board-level attention at a future evaluation cycle.

1 evidence refs
CTO

Canada's Stablecoin Act supervisory mandate stands as unchanged context; implementing regulations remain targeted for 2027.

No new technical or architectural obligation attaches to stablecoin issuers this cycle; the Bank of Canada's registry, reserve, and redemption requirements remain pending implementing regulations, so infrastructure planning timelines are unaffected for now.

1 evidence refs
Risk

FATF names professional money-laundering intermediaries as a structural feature of Canada's dominant laundering typologies.

The explicit identification of professional intermediaries alongside drug trafficking, fraud, and tax-crime proceeds as dominant typologies signals a facilitator-channel risk concentration worth incorporating into exposure-concentration assessments for Canada-linked counterparties.

1 evidence refs
Operations

No material change this cycle.

No material change for this persona this cycle

Audit

FATF evaluation flags weak risk-based supervision effectiveness as an unresolved control gap in Canada's AML regime.

The report's own identification of supervisory-effectiveness weakness is a documented control gap that internal audit functions assessing Canada-related AML control testing scope should note as flagged by a primary international evaluator, independent of any change to domestic statute.

1 evidence refs
Decision lens
MLRO

Canada's FATF mutual evaluation finds structural AML progress but flags under-prioritised prosecution of complex money-laundering cases relative to risk.

Compliance

FATF credits Canada's beneficial ownership registry and FINTRAC cross-check duty as structural AML progress.

Legal

No material change this cycle.

Board

Canada avoided FATF increased monitoring but the evaluation flags unresolved supervisory-effectiveness and prosecution-prioritisation gaps.

CTO

Canada's Stablecoin Act supervisory mandate stands as unchanged context; implementing regulations remain targeted for 2027.

Risk

FATF names professional money-laundering intermediaries as a structural feature of Canada's dominant laundering typologies.

Operations

No material change this cycle.

Audit

FATF evaluation flags weak risk-based supervision effectiveness as an unresolved control gap in Canada's AML regime.

Shared evidence: 2 refs
Scenario sketches

AMLA transition and cross-border supervisory divergence

Illustrative orientation only: as the EU moves from purely national AML supervision toward AMLA direct and indirect supervision of cross-border obliged entities under the AMLA Regulation (Reg (EU) 2024/1620), alongside the directly-applicable AMLR (Reg 2024/1624) and per-state 6AMLD transposition, non-EEA jurisdictions such as Canada that interact with EU-supervised entities through correspondent or cross-border financial relationships could see second-order effects on due-diligence expectations imposed on them by EU counterparties, independent of any change to Canada's own domestic regime. This is architecture-over-incident framing: a supervisory-perimeter shift in one jurisdiction can reshape counterparty expectations elsewhere without any enforcement event occurring in either jurisdiction.

Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only. Not compliance advice, not a prediction, and not a statement of observed fact.

Standing trackers (T1–T6)
TrackerStatusNote
T1 · Russian Sanctions-Evasion ArchitecturestableNo new Canadian Russia-sanctions action confirmed strictly within this window; most recent amendment dated 2026-09-04 falls outside window.
T2 · EU AML Package / AMLAno_changeNot applicable: Canada is autonomous, non-EEA/UK jurisdiction; AMLR/6AMLD/AMLA instrument set does not bind CA.
T3 · FATF Grey ListimprovingCanada's fifth-round mutual evaluation published 29 September 2026; Canada was NOT placed on the FATF grey list and recommended for normal follow-up.
T4 · Beneficial-Ownership Register StatuswatchFATF MER positively characterises Canada's BO transparency progress via the federal ISC registry and provincial parallel efforts.
T5 · Crypto & Digital-Asset IntegritystableNo new window-specific crypto-AML action; FINTRAC MSB revocation wave and Stablecoin Act 2027 target carry forward unchanged.
T6 · Sanctions Regime DivergencestableNo new CA-specific divergence signal identified within the window.
Registers

Enforcement actions

  • FINTRAC assessed a record administrative monetary penalty of approximately CAD 177 million (~US$126 million) against Xeltox Enterprises Ltd., operator of the Cryptomus crypto payment/exchange platform, for multiple violations of Canada's money-laundering and terrorist-financing legislation, including exposure to IRGC-linked Iranian exchange flows. 22 Oct 2025
  • FINTRAC struck the registrations of 35 crypto/money-services businesses (12 earlier in the month, 23 in a subsequent tranche) from its registry of firms permitted to provide money services in Canada, following investigative reporting that found dozens of unregistered Toronto-area crypto shops handling large, unmonitored transaction volumes. 24 Mar 2026
  • Canada announced new Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations designations targeting drone/UAV manufacturers and 100 vessels identified as part of Russia's sanctions-evading 'shadow fleet', coordinated with Ukraine at a G7 foreign ministers meeting. 12 Nov 2025
  • U.S. regulators assessed a record $1.3 billion FinCEN penalty (part of a ~US$3.09 billion global resolution) against TD Bank's U.S. subsidiaries for pervasive BSA/AML failures that allowed fentanyl-trafficking, human-trafficking and Ponzi-scheme proceeds to move through the bank, imposing a four-year independent monitorship. Though the consent order predates this baseline's strict 18-month window, the monitorship remains an active supervisory condition shaping the Canadian parent's cross-border AML remediation through the present. 10 Oct 2024

Sanctions changes

  • Canada added Russian drone/UAV manufacturers and 100 'shadow fleet' tanker vessels to its Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations designations, announced jointly with Ukraine's Foreign Minister at a G7 meeting in Ontario. 12 Nov 2025
  • The EU's 19th sanctions package (23 October 2025) extended designations to Russian energy actors, third-country banks and crypto-asset service providers facilitating sanctions evasion, broadening the EU's toolkit beyond measures currently available under Canada's SEMA regime. 23 Oct 2025

Regulatory horizon (register)

  • Publication of Canada's 5th-round FATF-APG Mutual Evaluation Report
  • FATF Roadmap of Key Recommended Actions for Canada
  • Provincial interconnection of federal beneficial-ownership registry

Active schemes

  • [HIGH] Vancouver-based crypto processor as Russia/Iran laundering conduit
  • [HIGH] Vancouver Model: casino/real-estate trade-based laundering
  • [HIGH] Legal-profession AML exemption as structural gatekeeper gap
  • Toronto crypto-to-cash desks feeding cross-border laundering
Sources
  1. Government of Canada, Department of Finance
  2. Financial Action Task Force (multilateral first-party assessment of Canada)
  3. Financial Action Task Force
  4. TRM Labs
  5. Bloomberg
  6. ICIJ
  7. OCCRP
  8. Bloomberg
  9. European Commission
  10. ICIJ
  11. FinCEN (U.S. Department of the Treasury)
Coverage gaps
A Supreme Court ruling constitutionally exempts legal counse…
A Supreme Court ruling constitutionally exempts legal counsel, law firms and Quebec notaries from AML/CFT reporting and client-identification obligations, leaving a core gatekeeper profession outside FINTRAC's reporting-entity perimeter.
The Cullen Commission found FINTRAC received over 31 million…
The Cullen Commission found FINTRAC received over 31 million individual reports in 2019-20 but disclosed only 2,057 to law enforcement nationally (355 in British Columbia), a severe intelligence-to-action conversion failure that June 2024 PCMLTFA amendments aim to address but whose effectiveness is not yet independently verified.
Canada's federal public beneficial-ownership registry under …
Canada's federal public beneficial-ownership registry under the CBCA covers only federally incorporated companies; the large majority of Canadian companies are incorporated provincially, and major provinces including Ontario and Alberta have not committed to feeding beneficial-ownership data into a national system.
This baseline could not identify a confirmed Canada-specific…
This baseline could not identify a confirmed Canada-specific jihadist/CTF hawala or NGO-misuse enforcement case within the 18-month window despite targeted searches; Canada-specific CTF typology evidence relies on FATF's general 2025 finding that 69% of assessed jurisdictions show major or structural TF-prosecution deficiencies rather than a Canada-specific incident record.

Evidence

Confidence-tiered claims

FATF/APG fifth-round Mutual Evaluation Report of Canada published 29 September 2026; Canada not placed under increased monitoring and recommended for normal follow-up. SRC-fim-CA-001
Probable · 1 source
FATF MER credits Canada with advancing its beneficial ownership transparency framework, referencing the federal ISC public BO registry (live since January 2024) and FINTRAC's October 2025 cross-check duty. SRC-fim-CA-001
Probable · 1 source
Canada improved on Recommendation 8 (non-profit organisations) from 'Partially Compliant' (2021 follow-up) to 'Largely Compliant' in the 2026 evaluation, though continuing weakness in oversight of ordinary tax-exempt non-profits outside the CRA Charities Directorate's registered-charity regime remains flagged. SRC-fim-CA-001
Probable · 1 source
FATF MER states Canada's money laundering is mainly linked to proceeds from drug trafficking, fraud, commercial trade fraud and tax crimes, often involving organised crime groups and professional money-laundering intermediaries. SRC-fim-CA-001
Probable · 1 source
Standing context: Bank of Canada designated primary supervisory authority for non-prudentially-regulated stablecoin issuers; implementing regulations targeted for 2027 in-force date; registry/reserve/redemption obligations not yet operative. SRC-fim-CA-006
Probable · 1 source