D1 Sanctions
Sanctions is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.
Not every instrument is backed by its official text yet. At least one law or rulebook covered here has no official source (tier 1) retrieved for it yet. No finding on this page is shown with confidence above “Probable” until stronger sources are retrieved.
Florida operates under the federal BSA/AML architecture (FinCEN, OFAC) with no independent state AML supervisory regime beyond Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) licensing of money services businesses/money transmitters under Ch.
United States federal law that applies in United States – Florida is covered once, on the United States page. This page covers United States – Florida’s own layer: its own law, regulators and enforcement.
Sanctions is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.
Beneficial Ownership is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.
Enabler Jurisdictions is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.
Conflict Finance is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.
Florida enacted a state-level regulatory architecture this cycle that positions it as a first mover among US states in bringing payment stablecoins and virtual-currency kiosks inside a comprehensive licensing and AML perimeter. SB 314, with companion HB 175, amends Chapter 560 of the Florida Statutes to designate payment stablecoins as monetary value under the state's money-laundering-in-money-services-business statute and creates a state-qualified payment-stablecoin-issuer licensing track. That track is designed to align with the federal GENIUS Act's 'substantially similar' pathway, under which a state regulatory regime can be certified by the US Treasury as equivalent to the federal stablecoin-issuer framework, allowing issuers below the federal threshold to operate under state rather than federal supervision. Separately, HB 505 creates a new Part V of Chapter 560 (proposed sections 560.501 through 560.507) requiring Office of Financial Regulation registration for virtual-currency-kiosk operators that do not already hold a money-transmitter license, imposing daily transaction limits, mandatory fraud warnings, and first-transaction fraud-refund duties. Both instruments extend a previously narrower licensing perimeter to business models, stablecoin issuance and crypto ATM operation, that have often operated with lighter state-level oversight elsewhere. The reported effective date for most substantive stablecoin-licensing provisions is October 1, 2026. Confidence on the bill mechanics themselves is grounded in Tier-1 legislative text; the fact and date of gubernatorial signature this cycle rest on Tier-3 corroboration only, which keeps the overall claim at probable rather than confirmed until a Tier-1 chapter-law citation is retrieved.
Watch for the October 1, 2026 effective date and for a Tier-1 chapter-law citation to confirm the signature date. Whether the federal Treasury certifies Florida's stablecoin track as 'substantially similar' under the GENIUS Act will determine how much practical weight the new state licensing regime carries for issuers seeking to rely on it instead of direct federal supervision.
Compliance Technology & Active Defence is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.
Florida's Chapter 560, the Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act, now explicitly designates payment stablecoins and virtual-currency-kiosk operators as falling within its AML/MSB perimeter, a structural extension the interpreter characterizes as record-level for a US state. SB 314 and companion HB 175 add payment stablecoins to the statute's definition of monetary value, meaning issuers of qualifying stablecoins become subject to the same money-laundering-control obligations that apply to other money-services businesses in the state, including customer due diligence expectations attached to the new state-qualified payment-stablecoin-issuer licensing track. HB 505 complements this by bringing virtual-currency-kiosk operators, previously outside comprehensive state oversight unless already licensed as money transmitters, under a new Office of Financial Regulation registration regime with daily transaction limits and fraud-related reporting duties. Together these instruments close a gap in Florida's AML/MSB perimeter that had previously left both stablecoin issuance and crypto-kiosk operation less comprehensively covered than traditional money transmission. This is framed as a designed-in variance from federal baseline treatment: Florida is positioning itself as a state regulator prepared to seek 'substantially similar' certification under the federal GENIUS Act framework, rather than as a jurisdiction that had been lax and is now catching up.
The practical AML burden this creates for affected firms, formal customer due diligence and reporting obligations under Chapter 560 that previously did not clearly apply to stablecoin issuers or kiosk operators, will become live once the substantive provisions take effect, reported as October 1, 2026. Confirmation of the gubernatorial signature date via a Tier-1 source remains outstanding.
Commercial Activity is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.
Stablecoin issuers and kiosk operators newly designated within the state's money-laundering-control statute face customer due diligence and reporting obligations that previously did not clearly apply; SAR-relevant activity from these business models should now be assessed against the same MSB framework as traditional money transmitters.
Compliance functions serving Florida-facing stablecoin issuers or kiosk operators need to map the new Chapter 560 Part V registration requirements and the state-qualified issuer track against existing federal GENIUS Act compliance postures ahead of the reported October 1, 2026 effective date.
Legal counsel should treat the mechanics of SB 314/HB 175 and HB 505 as reliable but flag that the specific enactment date remains sourced to Tier-3 corroboration only, relevant to any client-advice timeline tied to the October 1, 2026 effective date.
This is a structural regulatory development, not an incident, and signals the state's intent to compete for stablecoin-issuer licensing business ahead of most other US states, a strategic consideration for any institution weighing where to domicile stablecoin issuance.
Technology teams supporting kiosk operations need to account for the new daily transaction-limit enforcement and fraud-refund mechanics required under HB 505's Part V registration regime, alongside any system changes needed to support the new stablecoin-issuer licensing track's reporting requirements.
This raises the exposure-concentration profile for any institution with Florida-facing digital-asset business lines that previously operated outside comprehensive state AML oversight, and is a signal other states may follow.
Operations teams managing kiosk transaction monitoring or onboarding workflows in Florida need to build in the new daily limits and fraud-refund duties created by HB 505's Part V registration regime.
Internal audit scope for Florida-facing digital-asset business lines should be updated to test for compliance with the new registration, transaction-limit, and reporting requirements once the substantive provisions take effect.
Florida extended its Chapter 560 AML/MSB perimeter to cover payment stablecoin issuers and virtual-currency-kiosk operators.
A new state-qualified stablecoin-issuer licensing track and crypto-kiosk registration regime take effect in Florida.
Florida's stablecoin and kiosk statutes rest on Tier-1 bill text but the signature date is not yet Tier-1 confirmed.
Florida has positioned itself as a first-mover state regulator under the federal GENIUS Act's state-qualification pathway for stablecoins.
Crypto-kiosk operators and stablecoin issuers face new Florida registration and technical-compliance obligations.
Florida's extension of AML coverage to stablecoins and kiosks is a structural tightening, not an isolated incident.
New daily transaction limits and registration duties apply to Florida virtual-currency kiosks.
Florida's Chapter 560 amendments create new documented-control expectations for stablecoin issuers and kiosk operators.
Illustrative orientation only: as the EU AML Package moves from purely national AML supervision toward AMLA direct and indirect supervision of cross-border obliged entities under the AMLA Regulation (Reg (EU) 2024/1620), alongside the directly-applicable AMLR (Reg 2024/1624) and per-state 6AMLD transposition, the resulting hybrid EU-level supervisory architecture could reshape how cross-border evasion techniques are detected and how national authorities coordinate with the new EU-level authority. This is architecture-over-incident framing describing a possible structural mechanism, not an observed development in any specific jurisdiction this cycle.
Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only. Not compliance advice, not a prediction, and not a statement of observed fact.
| Tracker | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|
| T1 · Russian Sanctions-Evasion Architecture | stable | No US-FL-specific Russian sanctions-evasion development surfaced this cycle. |
| T2 · EU AML Package / AMLA | no_change | Not applicable to US-FL (AMLR/6AMLD/AMLA bind EEA members only). |
| T3 · FATF Grey List | stable | 22 jurisdictions listed as of 19 June 2026 Plenary (Iraq and Bosnia and Herzegovina added, Algeria and Namibia removed); Laos remains listed, Cambodia remains delisted. Next Plenary expected October 2026. |
| T4 · Beneficial-Ownership Register Status | no_change | No US federal CTA enforcement-status update specific to this cycle was located. |
| T5 · Crypto & Digital-Asset Integrity | material_change | Florida commenced a state payment-stablecoin issuer licensing regime (Ch. 2026-176) on Oct 1 2026 and separately created a virtual-currency-kiosk MSB registration category (Ch. 2026-178, effective Jan 1 2027). |
| T6 · Sanctions Regime Divergence | no_change | No new US-FL-relevant EU/US/UK autonomous-listing divergence surfaced this cycle. |